tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: snprintf(3) behaviour regarding large "n"

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: snprintf(3) behaviour regarding large "n"
From: Steffen Nurpmeso <sdaoden%yandex.com@localhost>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:14:01 +0200

P.S.: it would possibly be even better to not do something like
casting a size_t to int and testing for negativity, but simply
testing '> INT_MAX' instead.

--steffen

Follow-Ups:
- Re: snprintf(3) behaviour regarding large "n"
  - From: Steffen Nurpmeso

References:
- snprintf(3) behaviour regarding large "n"
  - From: Steffen Nurpmeso

Prev by Date: snprintf(3) behaviour regarding large "n"
Next by Date: Re: snprintf(3) behaviour regarding large "n"
Previous by Thread: snprintf(3) behaviour regarding large "n"
Next by Thread: Re: snprintf(3) behaviour regarding large "n"
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index