[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: bin/48684: spell(1) is lacking
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:10 AM, <dholland%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
>>Synopsis: spell(1) is lacking
>>Arrival-Date: Thu Mar 27 01:40:00 +0000 2014
>>Originator: David A. Holland
>>Release: NetBSD 6.99.28 (20131210)
> System: NetBSD valkyrie 6.99.28 NetBSD 6.99.28 (VALKYRIE) #14: Tue Dec 10
> 15:15:49 EST 2013 dholland@valkyrie:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/VALKYRIE
> Architecture: x86_64
> Machine: amd64
> spell(1) is a bit lacking. While it works on simple cases, e.g.
> valkyrie% echo 'frog' | /usr/bin/spell
> valkyrie% echo 'frogp' | /usr/bin/spell
> it accepts some interesting things:
> valkyrie% echo 'frogment' | /usr/bin/spell
> valkyrie% echo 'frogmental' | /usr/bin/spell
> valkyrie% echo 'froghood' | /usr/bin/spell
> valkyrie% echo 'frogship' | /usr/bin/spell
> valkyrie% echo 'biofrog' | /usr/bin/spell
> valkyrie% echo 'electrofrog' | /usr/bin/spell
> valkyrie% echo 'overfrog' | /usr/bin/spell
> All hail the overfrog, or something.
> This is because it has a set of suffix and prefix combining rules that
> it applies rather ... liberally.
> I dunno. My inclination is towards cvs rm -- there are perfectly good
> third-party spellcheckers at this point, natural language processing
> is not exactly core OS functionality or the project's core competency,
> and I don't think there's any need to maintain our own program given
> that it doesn't work very well.
I would like to take this up as a project. I have played with the idea
of a spell checker for the apropos(1) project (even implemented one,
although quite a naive implementation). I would like to take this
opportunity to come up with a more sophisticated implementation of the
spell checker and implementing it in the form of a library so that
other utilities (like apropos(1)) may also benefit from it.
Main Index |
Thread Index |