tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: A draft for a multibyte and multi-codepoint C string interface

>> The 16 bit restriction was a conscious decision, right?  ISO 10646
>> was 31 bit from the very start.  [...]
> Are there really people who want to switch to "Unicode" and not
> UTF-8, [...]?

Well, I don't know about `people', but I probably count.  I think the
only sane way to do Unicode is to widen `char'.

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML      
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index