[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: mblen.3 asserts mblen(3) is from ISO C89
Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost> wrote:
|> Shouldn't this be ISO C90 (even Addendum 1? ..but haven't found
|> a mandoc symbol for that)?
|> I can't find an english version of pre-C99, but can assure you
|> that my german translation of ANSI C, i.e., "The C Programming
|> Language, Second Edition, ANSI C", does not mention it.
|Perhaps you should file a PR with a change to add a mandoc symbol for
|missing standards version, and then another to fix this if you can chase
|down a proper reference. I only found:
|which says "ISO C", which means "ISO/IEC 9899: 1990, 1994"
i also found
but no occurrences of ANSI C, which is what i've searched for, also
in /usr/share/tmac/. Much smarter would have been a search for
isoc, since that would have revealed mdoc.local.
I looked into libc/locale/ today and found the functions in
question being implemented in multibyte_c90.c and
multibyte_amd1.c, which makes me believe that is right.
I've send a hopefully correct patch that changes the manuals
Main Index |
Thread Index |