[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Post-mortem debugging tools
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 01:16:11AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 10:25:23AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 09:39:04PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > we have quite a few tools in base that still require KVM or optionally
> > > support it. Removing all tools that require KVM for operation (and
> > > therefore setgid) is one of the open goals. It would be nice if that
> > > doesn't require adding lots of duplicate code. For that, a decision is
> > > required what programs are required for post-mortem analysis (i.e.
> > > debugging kernel dumps) and limit dual-KVM/sysctl code paths to that.
> > ISTM that there should be one library (probably not the libkvm we
> > currently have) that does both things transparently. That, or sysctl
> > emulation for dump images.
> That still requires duplicate code, so it doesn't change the question of
> what such code is needed for.
Er wut? For any particular piece of data there are two rather
different ways to get it, but I don't see what's duplicative about
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |