tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: 16bit ctype table

On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 03:56:25AM +0900, Takehiko NOZAKI wrote:
> > I still don't see the point in redefining the ctype stuff. Does it
> > *really* break on any platform we care about?
> if you think so, it is the matter. maybe only in your mind.
> please clarify what are you warried about.
> it is far away from ``technical'' discussion.
> i'm getting sick of such uncertainty.

It is quite a technical issue. I don't see how any platform definition
of _RUNETYPE_A and friends can invalidate the definitions from
runetype_file.h, since it is pretty much the last thing included in
mklocale's sources. Duplicating the definitions in the source is
certainly bad.

I do have a minor aversion against _COMPAT_BSDCTYPE, since I don't think
having individual compat macros is useful.


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index