tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: rb_tree_iterate(3) documentation vs. implementation

On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:

- There is also PR/45893.  The reason why these changes were not made are
 concerns about breaking backwards compatibility (apparently, there are
 3rd party users of this library already).  In theory, it is not too late,
 as netbsd-6 will be the first release shipping rbtree(3), but we need to
 reach the consensus on this.

Seems to me, we ought to get this "right" before we formally ship. The "early adopters" who are already using rbtree(3) already should be few in number and hopefully we could work with them to adapt to the changes.

| Paul Goyette     | PGP Key fingerprint:     | E-mail addresses:       |
| Customer Service | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at    |
| Network Engineer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at |
| Kernel Developer |                          | pgoyette at  |

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index