tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: db(3) removal and lastlogx

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 05:54:51PM +0000, Michael van Elst wrote:
> (Manuel Bouyer) writes:
> >With 32bit uids, this will be very large files. We should avoid this.
> In particular because we went to use db to avoid sparse files.

It's impossible to tell from the history, which is why I brought this
up. Note that the lack of used markers in lastlog (not lastlogx) made it
hard to find which entries are present. That was a serious limitation of
the old format.


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index