tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: asynchronous make(1), anyone?

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:01:25AM -0400, Julio Merino wrote:
 > > It seems to me that there's inherently a *PONY HAPPENS* step required
 > > in the middle there.
 > And yet, there are systems in which such ponies do exist.  (Granted,
 > they are IDEs, but that does not mean this idea is not feasible.)

IDEs have a substantially greater ability to reason about what's
happening. (Especially the ones where you have a 'project' instead of

David A. Holland

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index