[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: asynchronous make(1), anyone?
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:01:25AM -0400, Julio Merino wrote:
> > It seems to me that there's inherently a *PONY HAPPENS* step required
> > in the middle there.
> And yet, there are systems in which such ponies do exist. (Granted,
> they are IDEs, but that does not mean this idea is not feasible.)
IDEs have a substantially greater ability to reason about what's
happening. (Especially the ones where you have a 'project' instead of
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |