Re: Support for boolean queries in apropos

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 07:02:02AM -0400, Matthew Mondor wrote:
> If this was used, probably that a form of escaping could be used when
> we want to match AND, i.e. 'AND'?  Another option would be to preserve
> the verbose names but to require a prefix for the symbols of boolean
> operators, such as :AND which would be less likely to clash.

"and" is a stop word and filtered out anyway.

Joerg