[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: cp/mv and extended attributes preservation
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> ... But perhaps you were just
> suggesting that the function should move to a standalone src/bin/mv/utils.c
> and have src/bin/cp/utils.c doing @ #include "../mv/utils.c" ?
This is what I meant (using .PATH in one makefile to pull in whatever.c
from the other directory). That said, I wouldn't be against putting it
in a library. Would libutil be more appropriate though?
Main Index |
Thread Index |