tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: compiler-rt and softfloat

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: compiler-rt and softfloat
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:11:55 +0200

On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:03:43AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> No, actually, they are a pretty consistent, if underspecified API.

It is the "underspecified" that makes me nervous a bit, and there might
be corner cases where compilers need special code to work around their
own limitations (like gcc not using the udivx instrution on sparc64
when compiling for 32bit targets).

Martin

References:
- compiler-rt and softfloat
  - From: Matt Thomas
- Re: compiler-rt and softfloat
  - From: Masao Uebayashi
- Re: compiler-rt and softfloat
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: Re: compiler-rt and softfloat
Next by Date: Re: /etc/rc.d/bluetooth
Previous by Thread: Re: compiler-rt and softfloat
Next by Thread: Re: compiler-rt and softfloat
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index