Re: Import of compiler-rt

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>]

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 08:13:40PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Hi all,
> $SUBJECT says it all -- I would like to continue the quest for a GPL
> free base system by importing compiler-rt. It provides a replacement for
> libgcc. It's readable code and comes with a bunch of test cases that
> should provide a good coverage. I expect some work to be necessary for
> optimising code on the more exotic platforms, but having one file per
> function already makes working on it a lot easier. The code uses the
> LLVM license.

Is the intention to replace libgcc, to replace parts of libgcc, or to
keep both compiler-rt (for PCC and LLVM?) and libgcc (for GCC) in the
tree?

Thor