Re: Remote pid with SOCK_DGRAM local socket

[manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus)]

Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost> wrote:

> What process group does perfused end up in?  Its own?  Otherwise killpg
> might do the trick.

perfused is still in the process group of the terminal it was launched.
But glusterfs gets -1, acording to ps -o pid,tpgid,command

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost