[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: libcodecs(3), take 4
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 02:54:20PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 02:42:02PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> >> Usually libraries don't print error messages to stderr, nor exit.
> > That's true for some libraries, but not for all of them. At the same
> > time, printing error messages is far superior to the practise of
> > returning enumerated error values (like regexp libraries), or stacking
> > them up and vomiting them up at a later stage.
> libraries that do things like writing to stderr or even exit the callers
> program are a pest. I really dislike this part of the design. As an
> application programmer, I would like to be in control how to react to an
> error and not have the library to make assumptions on what is the right
> way to deal with a certain situation.
Forget the exit part - that was my mistake. (I saw many "if (error)
return 1;" in the code, that made me confused, and somehow transformed
to "exit(1);" in my head.)
> - Marc
Masao Uebayashi / Tombi Inc. / Tel: +81-90-9141-4635
Main Index |
Thread Index |