[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: datagram vs stream sockets
der Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost> wrote:
> > Perhaps the kernel just checks that a frame is consumed before
> > sending a new one? Unfortunately I am unaware of such a posibility
> > with stream sockets.
> In general, it's not possible. In the specific case of AF_LOCAL, it's
> relatively easy, at least within the kernel, because the peer socket is
> available for direct inspection.
The question is: do we have any way of doing that from userland?
I suspect that just using blocking I/O would fix the problem.
Unfortunately, I need non-blocking input. As far as I know it is not
possible to have non-blocking input and blocking output.
Main Index |
Thread Index |