Re: Support for kernel and lowlevel FUSE API

[Antti Kantee <pooka%cs.hut.fi@localhost>]

On Fri Aug 06 2010 at 20:56:59 +0200, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> > As stated in private email, I think most of the time it makes sense
> > to run perfused "inline" in the file server instead of requiring a
> > separate daemon.  This brings down the number of moving parts and I
> > assume simplifies e.g. permissions.
> 
> This is what I tried at the beginning but I quickly moved to the
> separate daemon approch: all filesystems link with libpthread, and
> mixing libpthread and libputfs is a reliable way to build a nice pile of
> cores.

You were most likely hitting PR lib/25563.  Set puffs_fakecc to reduce
the size of the pile of cores (see librefuse).