Re: proposal: inetd improvements.

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:43:25PM +0000, Michael van Elst wrote:
> That's about what we have now, but a bit more graceful because it allows
> for some retries and recovers automatically. Doesn't need configuration
> either :)

How does it recover automatically from wrong command arguments in the service
specification?

I'm pretty sure we are not talking about the same variant of failure here.

Martin