[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: RFC: Constant Database Support
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 02:08:39PM +0100, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> > from the name I first assumed it is compatible with DJB's cdb and
> > tinycdb, but from your description I think it is different?
> It is not. DJB's cdb has a number of critical flaws. cdb itself is just
> a very generic name... I don't care about the color much...
The color may not be important, but _please_ don't install a library
called "cdb" in base when we have something in pkgsrc that has installed
a library by the same name since 2001.
You also mentioned:
> ... Creation time drops from 1.9s to 0.23s
> on AMD64.
Do you have any info on lookup times? This is for write-only read-many
databases, so that would be a more important metric for me.
Also, do you have an example of how the reader (libc/net/getservent_r.c?)
Main Index |
Thread Index |