[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: prop_number(3) and portability of externalized plists
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 09:25:31PM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> > I'm bothered by the unconventional (for a Apple plists anyway) encoding
> > of unsigned integers in externalized proplib(3) plists.
> > At least Python's plistlib is unequiped to handle internalizing and
> > reexternalizing such numbers in base-16.
> I am OK with changing to outputting base-10 always, but I would
> like to keep the ability to internalize base-16. I am also OK just
> treating the number as int64_t (and thus outputting -ve numbers
> beyond INT64_MAX).
ISTM that if there's going to be a distinction between signed and
unsigned integer values, they should be tagged differently in the XML.
Is this hopelessly naive?
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |