[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Introducing the patchadd binary patch toolchain
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:41:07 -0400 (EDT)
der Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost> wrote:
> > The lack of binary patches is a major deficiency in NetBSD.
> It is also a major asset, and everything in between.
> Where on that spectrum it falls for any particular person depends on
> that person's goodness metric. Not everyone shares your point of
If the choice were binary-only or source-only, I'd definitely pick the
latter. If the choice were TNF-built binary patches vs. home-build
source, again I'd pick the latter. But if I'm running many machines, I
want an easy way to ship out binaries, whether I choose to use ones I
build or the ones that TNF will (presumably) provide. Source-only just
doesn't scale very well, especially for tiny machines.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Main Index |
Thread Index |