Re: Defining more PRIxxx macros

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:53:08AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
 > > I'd suggest that every _t type defined (anywhere in the basic system
 > > anyway) should have a PRI macro defined along with it (the sole
 > > exception being types that it is impossible to print with any simple
 > > format - structs and such).
 > 
 > I am very pleased to see support for this idea.

I still think this scheme is irredeemably ugly, but I don't really
have any better ideas.

Although I think just casting the value arguments to large-enough
integer types is a lot less error-prone.

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost