tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: [PATCH] strto*l() nonstandard behaviour fix

To: "Denis Lagno" <dlagno%rambler.ru@localhost>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] strto*l() nonstandard behaviour fix
From: "Andy Shevchenko" <andy.shevchenko%gmail.com@localhost>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:08:29 +0300

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
>> Draft of this document I have at hand does not prescribe any particular
>> behaviour for base outside its range.
And, please, write here the reasonable "digit" for base from 37..X.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] strto*l() nonstandard behaviour fix
  - From: Quentin Garnier

References:
- [PATCH] strto*l() nonstandard behaviour fix
  - From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH] strto*l() nonstandard behaviour fix
  - From: der Mouse
- Re: [PATCH] strto*l() nonstandard behaviour fix
  - From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH] strto*l() nonstandard behaviour fix
  - From: Denis Lagno
- Re: [PATCH] strto*l() nonstandard behaviour fix
  - From: Andy Shevchenko

Prev by Date: Re: using the interfaces in ctype.h
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] strto*l() nonstandard behaviour fix
Previous by Thread: Re: [PATCH] strto*l() nonstandard behaviour fix
Next by Thread: Re: [PATCH] strto*l() nonstandard behaviour fix
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index