[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: int vs. long in test(1)
On Jun 19, 2008, at 6:43 AM, Alan Barrett wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Thomas Klausner wrote:
sh(1)'s test (-current/amd64) doesn't deal with big numbers (>
Do we want to convert the code to use strtoimax() and return a long
(with checks) or even something bigger?
I think it would make sense to use intmax_t. We already do that for
the integers in shell arithmatic with the $((...)) syntax.
Isn't that wrong then for 64bit machines where int is 32 and the spec
says "signed long" is what should be used here?
Main Index |
Thread Index |