tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: obsoleting shlibs - what's the plan

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:53:02AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
  | So, I think these shouldn't have been marked obsolete, and that in
  | general that we should not obsolete previous major shlibs, just minor
  | ones (e.g., if .so.3.1 arrives we can remove .so.3.0, but not .so.2.1).

Correct.  I've fixed this.

Attachment: pgpRBcCbN_V0o.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index