[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: obsoleting shlibs - what's the plan
Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost> wrote:
> I just updated to 4.99.58 from 4.99.24 (!, long story, disk too small to
> build). Mostly things are working fine.
> I updated using BUILD-NetBSD from etcmanage, and then ran 'postinstall
> fix obsolete'. It deleted libraries that I think it shouldn't have:
> Removed obsolete file /usr/lib/libroken.so.12.3
> These are previous major versions of kerberos libraries.
> So, I think these shouldn't have been marked obsolete, and that in
> general that we should not obsolete previous major shlibs, just minor
> ones (e.g., if .so.3.1 arrives we can remove .so.3.0, but not .so.2.1).
You are correct, that's a bug. Old heimdal shared libs shouldn't have
been marked obsolete.
uwe%stderr.spb.ru@localhost | Zu Grunde kommen
http://snark.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen
Main Index |
Thread Index |