[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t (again)
Two weeks ago, I raised the question of renaming cpuset_t to cpu_set_t,
so that we can be source-compatible with the Linux definition (which has
rmind suggested that this could be possible but I would like to know what
has finally been decided, if anything has been decided.
Thanks for your answer!
Note: my problem comes from a stupid configure script that checks for
pthread_setaffinity_np() and if it finds it, then decides to call it with
a cpu_set_t parameter. I would like to avoid maintaining a separate patch
if NetBSD is going to change the type name...
Main Index |
Thread Index |