[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: swap-on-raidframe vs raidctl -P
>>> Couldn't raidframe just register a shutdown hook (or whatever it's
>>> called now) that would forcibly close devices ?
> No, but forcibly closing the raid device could solve other problems
> too, like (I suspect, I didn't try it) cgd on raid.
Until cgd registers a similar shutdown hook, and then some system has
both cgd-on-raid and raid-on-cgd (not necessarily the same raid/cgd
instances). Something that works per-driver with a single order of
hook execution *can't* get that right; it has to be either per-instance
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents.montreal.qc.ca@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Main Index |
Thread Index |