[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: swap-on-raidframe vs raidctl -P
> See <http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2005/05/09/0001.html> for
> my proposal from 2005.
That appears to depend on order of configuring to reverse to provide a
successful order of unconfiguring. This works in almost all cases, but
not quite all; consider something-on-RAID, with a vnd on that something
hot-added to the RAID. (This isn't really useful; except in some very
peculiar special cases, it'll infinite-recurse when the RAID gets used.
But it's an example of how the hierarchy can end up loopy.)
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents.montreal.qc.ca@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Main Index |
Thread Index |