Subject: RE: GPT guids
To: None <email@example.com>
From: De Zeurkous <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/17/2007 02:30:07
On Mon, December 17, 2007 01:55, der Mouse wrote:
>>>> In any case, I have /no/ intention of inhibiting sane, open-minded
>>>> discussion. In fact, I'm here to promote it.
>>> Your on-list behaviour - indeed, your name of choice - seem to me to
>>> be at odds with that statement.
>> ...digging beneath the surface. I go beyond HHOS. A lot of people
>> have great trouble with that; it's no shame you have, too.
> I have no trouble with it, per se.
Good to hear :)
> It just seems to me that a list
> like this, likely to be seen as part of the public face of the Project
> by relative newbies who don't even get as far as HHOS,
So, as I suspected, this is all about saving face? I'm instantly reminded
on the games/sex pkgsrc import request (PR #29929) which nobody
investigated and was proposed for closure just a few hours ago --
appearently it's master site disappeared, and no-one has ever bothered to
check it until now. If suddenly Sierra would decide to make LSL freely
distributable, would we be hesistant to include it too, purely for
> is not a
> particularly good place to practice it.
It's so inherently useful I practice it everywhere, every time. Besides,
better educate the worthy newbies and scare the unworthy ones away until
they become so.
P.S.: I would move this to private mail, but I presume the .info name
servers are not fixed up yet?
# Proud -net.kook- IRC bot overengineer
% NetBSD, zsh, twm, nvi and roff junkie
From the fool file:
I don't see why the way people have historically partitioned disks should
dictate which kernels we build and distribute by default in the future.
--Darren Reed (darrenr@NetBSD.org), NetBSD tech-kern