Subject: Re: libpthread and static constructor order
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Nick Hudson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/03/2007 19:59:54
On Saturday 03 November 2007 17:33:48 J.T. Conklin wrote:
> So while Thor's right that "libfool" (heh) is wrong in suppressing the
> libpthread dependency,
This is with an explicit -lpthread?
=46rom my distant (yay!) memory of libtool internals the use of -nostdlibs =
to workaround some incorrect gcc specs which have long since been corrected.