Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/libexec/httpd
To: Bill Stouder-Studenmund <email@example.com>
From: Daniel Carosone <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/17/2007 12:34:53
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:27:33PM -0700, Bill Stouder-Studenmund wrote:
> > I do not think it is a good way to import such applications into the ba=
> > source tree, at least while there is no appropriate support for syspkgs.
> Why? I agree we don't want to put everything in base. But on a=20
> case-by-case basis, I think it's fine if not appropriate to put stuff in=
> base. This seems like a good fit for base.
While I have a bias for importing stuff on general principle, I agree
with the above.
Perhaps we should consider whether there is something else we can get
rid of, which we don't really need in base any longer, perhaps so we
can make forward progress on both functionality and code maintenance
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----