Subject: Re: Binary backward compatibility
To: None <>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 10/12/2007 17:07:40
>> Or at least there is such goal?
> Yes, it's a goal, [...].  Exceptions that I can remember or suspect
> are:

One that bit me, but isn't on your list:

* As of some release (2,0, I think it was), executables using nested
  functions built on older versions would crash on the new release.

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B