Subject: Re: Compiling NetBSD with another compiler (ditroff & tools are
To: Thor Lancelot Simon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Daniel Carosone <email@example.com>
Date: 10/08/2007 14:44:49
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 12:20:13AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:55:32PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > At Fri, 05 Oct 2007 17:58:48 -0400, I wrote:
> > Subject: Re: Compiling NetBSD with another compiler.
> > >=20
> > > It would still probably be worth the effort to figure out the status =
> > > ditroff and if/how it could be properly open-sourced. Maybe the AST
> > > toolkit folks could help.
> > I keep forgetting about Plan 9 and the fact it is now open source.
> > Probably the best and most up-to-date version of ditroff _is_ open
> > sourced, and it _is_ the most recent full DWB code (modified as
> > necessary to port it to Plan 9, of course, including full Unicode
> > support):
> Oh, this is fantastic. What is Plan 9's current license?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----