On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 03:49:09PM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Pavel Cahyna wrote:
> >>Maybe follow grep(1)'s example:
> >>0 - no problem
> >>1 - a check/fix failed
> >>2 - an error ocurred
> >
> >OK. But then check will return a different code than fix, because when
> >"check" fails, "fix" is needed and it typically succeeds.
> 
> I don't understand. Why do you need different codes to indicate if a check or a fix failed - 
> don't you think people remember what they called? ;)

I don't need it but somebody maybe might not like the inconsistent return
codes...

Pavel