Subject: Re: Compiling NetBSD with another compiler.
To: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Anders Magnusson <email@example.com>
Date: 09/15/2007 15:19:25
Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Anders Magnusson wrote:
>> I have (as some people may know) been hacking on pcc for fun for some
> Tres cool! A few questions that I've seen people ask or that I
> wondered myself:
> * this is only C, no C++, right?
> * This is i386-only right now, right?
From a useable perspective, yes. Note that there are 6 archs in the
and vax and mips are probably quite easy to get going. But I have focused
on x86 lately just to get something done :-)
> * do you have any numbers on performance of both the compiler, and the
> compiled code? For example, how long does it take if you use PCC to
> do a "build.sh release", instead of using GCC)?
build.sh is a mess if you want to use something other than gcc, at least
know how to teach it something else. But a "traditional" make of the
# make USETOOLS=never MKOBJDIRS=no MKSHARE=no MKUPDATE=no NOINCLUDES=no
NOPIC=yes HAVE_GCC= MKGCC=no MKGDB=no MKPUFFS=no
tested with both compilers take 10 hours with gcc and just over two
hours with pcc.
This is on my quite slow transmeta-based Sony Vaio.
I have also run some benchmarks, like BYTEbench, and generally the
is a few percent worse with pcc except when strength reduction could be
it is much worse :-)
> * What license is the code under, exactly? I see some mention of
> Caldera on your homepage.
Caldera has a 4-clause BSD license on the original PCC code, I myself
use a 3-clause.
Therefore it was added to the web page :-)