Subject: Re: definition of TRUE and FALSE in system headers
To: None <zeurkous@nichten.info>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 07/25/2007 15:03:34
On Jul 23, 2007, at 4:46 PM, De Zeurkous wrote:

> Haai,
>
> On Mon, July 23, 2007 23:26, Luke Mewburn wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:07:13PM -0000, De Zeurkous wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>
>> No, it doesn't make sense given that it would introduce unnecessary
>> namespace pollution.  Which was the point of the original thread.
>>
>
> You misunderstand. My point is that is if they are to be defined  
> anywhere,
> they should be defined centrally. Having both case variants  
> potentially
> defined differently makes no sense at all. Developers should either  
> stick
> with one of them (lowercase being my personal favorite) or accept them
> standardized.

They are defined centrally in the kernel, but they should never be  
defined in user space.

-- thorpej