Subject: Re: is syspkg alive?
To: Hauke Fath <hauke@Espresso.Rhein-Neckar.DE>
From: Aleksey Cheusov <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/09/2007 07:45:44
>>tn3270, am-utils and even ctags - are good examples of extra things.
>For you. These days, almost all the machines that I set up run amd.
>Others may feel similar about ctags.
I also use am-utils and ctags, so what?
Do you want emacs in the base system? No? Why?
I need it and use it every day ;)
This doesn't mean anything at all.
Ok, let's stop this flame.
How about syspkg and unpriviledged ./build.sh?
Собрались в отпуск? Поиск туров - ТУТ: http://tourism.tut.by