Subject: tar(1): reading full blocks from pipes by default?
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Blair Sadewitz <email@example.com>
Date: 06/06/2007 15:50:20
After talking to Allen Briggs about progress(1) and pipes, I'm
wondering if tar -B should be the default if it is indeed reading from
a pipe. I admit, though, I don't know what the rationale was for
making this optional in the first place other than perhaps historical
compatability. Would it be reasonable to make -B default and instead
add an option to disable it?
I notice somewhat better performance (especially with LFS) using -B with pipes.