Subject: Re: raidframe parity: daily and before securelevel
To: Greg Oster <email@example.com>
From: rudolf <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/18/2007 19:40:47
Greg Oster wrote:
> The only reason a parity check should fail is if one of the
> components has errors, which the "has anything failed?" check
> should detect.
I have a small server (securelevel=2) which went through a power outage
and when it came up it had both components "optimal", but parity was
wrong ("Parity status: dirty"; it was not corrected by
/etc/rc.d/raidframeparity because of securelevel). The current daily
test doesn't detect this situation.