Subject: Re: missing #include ?
To: NetBSD User-Level Technical Discussion List <tech-userlevel@NetBSD.org>
From: Greg A. Woods <email@example.com>
Date: 12/11/2006 12:18:01
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
At Sun, 10 Dec 2006 13:51:11 -0500,
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> Maybe this time the change will happen. Here is a proposed change.
> Can we find out what the concensus is?
Personally I'd much rather see the opposite, i.e. that the default be
such that if a _system_ header file requires some other _system_ header
file, and especially if this is documented as a dependency in the system
API, and even more so if some API standard documents this dependency as
required, then the compiler should halt with an error stating that the
required #include is missing. It should most definitly not silently
include the documented dependent header!
While some programmers would like the system to take care of its own
dependencies, I would much rather that the programmer be forced to
understand these dependencies and the resulting impact on the final
Greg A. Woods
H:+1 416 218-0098 W:+1 416 489-5852 x122 VE3TCP RoboHack <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Planix, Inc. <email@example.com> Secrets of the Weird <firstname.lastname@example.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----