Subject: Re: missing #include ?
To: D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@NetBSD.org>
From: Martin Husemann <email@example.com>
Date: 12/10/2006 19:59:01
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 01:51:11PM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> Can we find out what the concensus is?
IIRC the consensus was: "it needs to be judged on a case by case basis".
The reason is massive namespace pollution that some headers cause, combined
with long standing historic practice for certain required combinations
New headers should probably be idempotent, and namespace pollution should
be fixed where possible.