Subject: Re: snprintf_ss (Re: CVS commit: src/include)
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/28/2006 13:22:24
On Oct 29, 12:55am, email@example.com (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: snprintf_ss (Re: CVS commit: src/include)
| > | anyway, i don't think trying to make stdio signal safe is a good idea.
| > Neither do I. I am just trying to make vsnprintf() signal safe, and it
| > has not proven easy.
| i meant, i don't think trying to make vsnprintf signal safe is a good idea.
| because it makes futher development of it nightmare.
| the functionality ssp needs is very limited and it's trivial to implement
| a dedicated signal safe logger for it, isn't it?
Yes, that is true. It could use a minimal logger.