Subject: Re: mv(1) and signals
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Hauke Fath <hauke@Espresso.Rhein-Neckar.DE>
Date: 10/17/2006 23:42:25
At 22:55 Uhr +0200 17.10.2006, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>Does anyone else think ^C should kill mv(1), first time, every
When you ^C restore(8), it asks for confirmation. Maybe if mv(1) was called
in a terminal session, make it behave similarly?
At least the current behaviour should be noted in the man page, though.
"It's never straight up and down" (DEVO)