Subject: Re: bin/34630: GNU sdiff(1) replacement
To: Mindaugas <email@example.com>
From: Daniel de Kok <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/11/2006 19:33:56
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 04:17:46PM +0300, Mindaugas wrote:
> 2. Offering sdiff(1) has regression tests and passed them all. While
> our GNU sdiff(1) does not pass more than half of them (from 35 tests).
I suppose half of the sdiff regression tests? Since you propose to
replace GNU diff with sdiff, it would be far more interesting to see
how sdiff performs with GNU diff regressions tests.