Subject: Re: handling removed logfiles [was: Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists/etc]
To: Alan Barrett <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
Date: 10/01/2006 00:47:39
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Alan Barrett wrote:
> I suggest a new keyword to be used in the set lists, meaning "obsolete,
> but likely to be precious". "postinstall check" could print a list of
> such files; "postinstall fix obsolete" would *not* delete them, but
> "postinstall fix obsolete-but-precious" would delete them.
So you're saying the previous commit (to actually remove the logfile
completely, instead of marking it as 'obsolete') was TRT. Until someone
implements the above changes, I'll go back to that state then.
(I shouldn't always listen to people telling me stuff :-)