Subject: Re: "default shell" [was: Re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/user]
To: Mindaugas <unex@linija.org>
From: Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 09/30/2006 20:22:05
--0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 09:17:46PM +0300, Mindaugas wrote:
> > FWIW, I liked the idea suggesting to replace our /bin/csh with tcsh.
> I think it is a good idea. tcsh is compatible with csh - the main
> NetBSD's shell, it can be friendly and comfortable shell.

No, it's not good idea - using tcsh means introducing tcsh
into base, and I don't think that's a good idea.

Switching to ksh is fine and I fully support that.

Jaromir
--=20
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>            http://www.NetBSD.cz/
-=3D- We can walk our road together if our goals are all the same;     -=3D-
-=3D- We can run alone and free if we pursue a different aim.          -=3D-

--0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
MessageID: qzgCB/VgJcwDLsTxPe814hoaDATbpouZ

iQCVAwUBRR61zLZjOQfIPRaZAQGGngP/WzXRuQTFAY7rGTL27YVYFax9rd1ZJFmN
1NV2yBX/+4Bwhe+aRnVl4ZXcdHnGqmp/p0jp7oZ7/PgGXbFR8wWwYlgadsc5eEea
mQA47kdH4vn/7wap5jZWhhVoa44mUZ2ibE0UORn3qE+wfxAMAScPVgo1tS/6ox0g
9xtgu0Gddbc=
=B47y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz--