Subject: Re: [patch] Non strict dependency in rcorder
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Pavel Cahyna <email@example.com>
Date: 08/16/2006 17:09:26
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:11:32AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> UPHOLD and REQUIRE(S) - currently used way (with BEFORE replaced by UPHOLD)
> "UPHOLD" doesn't make sense to me.
> Given the backwards compat goal (which I think is reasonable), that
> leaves us with the choice:
> 1) backwards compat
> add BEFORE-IF-PRESENT and AFTER-IF-PRESENT, like BEFORE and AFTER but
> don't complain if not present
> 2) non-backwards-compat
> make BEFORE and AFTER not complain if not present
There is no AFTER atm.