Subject: Re: bin/32785 [dM] du not terabyte-clean
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: Bill Studenmund <>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 07/25/2006 13:13:40
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:04:40PM -0400, der Mouse wrote:
> >> Where do I get a suitable printf format for these types?  I seem to
> >> recall that there are macros from some include file, but can't
> >> recall enough details - PRIsomething, isn't it?
> > Right, <inttypes.h> (which gets it from machine/int_fmthio.h via
> > sys/inttypes.h):  [...example...]
> This actually turns out to not matter.  My changes don't touch any
> printf formats directly; printing is already handled, elsewhere.
> I've put a new patch into the PR (with a copy here).

I think the change is fine. However I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better=
to somehow version the _ftsent structure. I doubt that du will be the only=
directory-walking application that will need to deal with 64-bit values.

Take care,


Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)