Subject: Re: bin/32785 [dM] du not terabyte-clean
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/25/2006 13:13:40
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:04:40PM -0400, der Mouse wrote:
> >> Where do I get a suitable printf format for these types? I seem to
> >> recall that there are macros from some include file, but can't
> >> recall enough details - PRIsomething, isn't it?
> > Right, <inttypes.h> (which gets it from machine/int_fmthio.h via
> > sys/inttypes.h): [...example...]
> This actually turns out to not matter. My changes don't touch any
> printf formats directly; printing is already handled, elsewhere.
> I've put a new patch into the PR (with a copy here).
I think the change is fine. However I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better=
to somehow version the _ftsent structure. I doubt that du will be the only=
directory-walking application that will need to deal with 64-bit values.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----