Subject: Re: Where should progress(1) write?
To: Alan Barrett <email@example.com>
From: Tim Rightnour <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/14/2006 00:00:02
On 13-Jan-2006 Alan Barrett wrote:
> Well, I think that stderr would be the right default, and I can't easily
> think of a case where I'd want progress(1) to write to stdout. I can
> easily think of cases where I'd want output to /dev/tty (so stdout and
> stderr can be reserved for use by the command spawned by progress).
If people think this is a reasonable thing to do, I can back out the change,
and set the default output to stderr. However we need to know 2 things:
1) Will this affect any current uses of progress, such as sysinst? The -e
change was relatively safe because it didn't modify the default behavior,
however if people have written scripts or whatnot around the current behavior
of progress, we may break them unexpectedly. I don't take that as lightly.
2) You propose wanting to output to /dev/tty. How do you propose we allow that
from an option standpoint? A -d <device> option?
Tim Rightnour <email@example.com>
NetBSD: Free multi-architecture OS http://www.netbsd.org/
Genecys: Open Source 3D MMORPG: http://www.genecys.org/